Back To CourseAmerican Government: Help and Review
20 chapters | 299 lessons
As a member, you'll also get unlimited access to over 70,000 lessons in math, English, science, history, and more. Plus, get practice tests, quizzes, and personalized coaching to help you succeed.Free 5-day trial
You have the right to free speech. But, does this mean you have the right to yell at your neighbor's house through a bullhorn at three in the morning? You have the right to legal counsel. But, what if you can't afford a lawyer? Should the state pay for you? You have all these rights. But, if you're arrested, does someone have to remind you?
The issue of civil liberties is a vital one to all Americans, if only because the Constitution is often vague on what those rights actually mean. Even more confusing, there's a significant difference between civil rights and civil liberties, a distinction that is small but crucial to understanding why civil liberties are important and protected at all. Fortunately, a process exists which helps to clarify the differences and distinctions for all Americans, a process which sometimes stops at the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Constitution is a list of 'do's': a document explaining what the federal government is allowed to do and areas in which it is allowed to be present. The Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to that Constitution (as well as the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments passed after the Civil War and usually considered part of the American guarantee of rights) are a list of 'do-nots,' which apply specifically to the federal government. These relate to rights we all hold, which can't be violated or suppressed.
So there's a distinction between civil rights, which means 'the basic right to be free from unequal treatment, based on certain characteristics which we deem important, like race, gender, and disability,' and civil liberties, which are 'basic freedoms guaranteed by the Bill of Rights or interpreted through the years by courts and lawmakers.' For most of us, then, when we talk about our 'rights,' we're really talking about our 'liberties.'
The rights we are guaranteed in the Constitution and in federal law are sometimes very well-known, and sometimes a little more obscure. Some of them are explicitly guaranteed in the Bill of Rights, such as the right to free speech, while others have been inferred from those rights and made real by court decisions or acts of law, such as the right to privacy. The essential civil liberties guaranteed in the United States are, in no particular order:
As mentioned earlier, many of these liberties are the product not of the Bill of Right's original text, but instead were based on court cases.
Schenck v. United States
In 1919, Charles Schenck was arrested for distributing a pamphlet which criticized the U.S. military draft and offered advice on how to evade it. He was arrested and charged with violating the Espionage Act, which made illegal any attempt 'to cause insubordination' in U.S. military forces. Schenck's defense was that the act violated the First Amendment and his right to free speech.
The Supreme Court disagreed, and in their ruling helped to refine what the idea of free speech really meant. The Court came up with an elegant metaphor to explain their thinking, the now famous 'crowded theatre' example: a man shouts 'Fire!' in a crowded theatre, causing a panic and a stampede in which people may be injured.
While such an act may be protected in a private dwelling, the First Amendment didn't extend to an act that may result in someone else's injury. The phrase 'clear and present danger' became the principle against which speech could be judged. Since what Schenck advocated could present such a danger to U.S. interests, it could be limited or even prohibited.
Miranda v. Arizona
Ernesto Miranda was arrested on suspicion of rape in 1963. During interrogation, Miranda confessed to the crime without being told that he had a right to representation by a lawyer and to remain silent. On appeal, Miranda claimed that he should have been made aware of these rights. The government objected, claiming that it had no obligation to explicitly inform him of his rights. The Supreme Court, however, disagreed, and a new verb was born: to be 'mirandized' means to have your rights read to you, and is now required after every arrest.
Engel v. Vitale
In 1962, families in New York filed a lawsuit over what they saw as a violation of their First Amendment rights to be free of an established religion. Every day in public schools in New Hyde Park, New York a prayer was read over the intercom; the families (most of whom were Jewish) saw this as a state endorsement of an organized religion.
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the families, stating that the school, as an organ of the government, had to remain nonsectarian, and that sponsored school prayer was unconstitutional. If a student wants to pray to him or herself, that's just fine. Sponsored prayers are school-wide and done with the administration's consent.
Gideon v. Wainwright, 1963
Clarence Gideon was arrested and charged with breaking into a pool hall in Panama City, Florida, in 1961. Because it was a non-capital crime (you couldn't be sentenced to death for it), Gideon wasn't guaranteed a lawyer under Florida law, and he couldn't afford one. So he was forced to represent himself. Naturally enough, Gideon was convicted and sentenced to prison.
While there, he used the prison library to compose his own appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which took his case in 1963. Their ruling changed how criminal law worked in the U.S. and strengthened the implicit civil liberty: everyone, regardless of the severity of the alleged crime, is entitled to legal representation, even if he or she can't afford it.
Tinker v. Des Moines School District
Three students, Mary Beth Tinker, her brother, John, and their friend Chris Eckhardt, arrived at their high school in Des Moines, Iowa in 1965 wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War. A school administrator insisted they remove them, as it might prove a disturbance in class. When the students refused, they were suspended.
Their families filed a lawsuit, and eventually it worked its way to the Supreme Court. The Court ruled with the students, saying that freedom of speech and expression 'did not stop at the schoolhouse door.' But it also said that the students' rights while in school are not as expansive as for non-students, given the school's mission.
Of course, there are dozens of court cases and federal laws which have strengthened, defined, and (in many cases) restricted our civil liberties. But what may be most important about the issue of civil liberties at all is that a process exists which allows us to fit our freedoms to our time, a process that, regardless of which side on a given issue you sit, both sides respect.
Civil liberties are specific rights guaranteed to be free from governmental restriction or suppression. Civil liberties are distinct from civil rights, which refer to our general rights to be free from unequal treatment before the law. Civil liberties are derived from both the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and have been refined and specified through the federal court system and the U.S. Supreme Court.
This lesson on civil liberties is designed to help you prepare to:
To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account
Did you know… We have over 95 college courses that prepare you to earn credit by exam that is accepted by over 2,000 colleges and universities. You can test out of the first two years of college and save thousands off your degree. Anyone can earn credit-by-exam regardless of age or education level.
To learn more, visit our Earning Credit Page
Not sure what college you want to attend yet? Study.com has thousands of articles about every imaginable degree, area of study and career path that can help you find the school that's right for you.
Back To CourseAmerican Government: Help and Review
20 chapters | 299 lessons