Classical Social Theory: Marx & Durkheim on Modernity

An error occurred trying to load this video.

Try refreshing the page, or contact customer support.

Coming up next: Max Weber's Analysis of Modernity

You're on a roll. Keep up the good work!

Take Quiz Watch Next Lesson
Your next lesson will play in 10 seconds
  • 00:00 Durkheim & Marx on Modernity
  • 00:49 Durkheim & the…
  • 3:45 Karl Marx & Capitalism
  • 5:42 Lesson Summary
Save Save Save

Want to watch this again later?

Log in or sign up to add this lesson to a Custom Course.

Log in or Sign up

Speed Speed Audio mode

Recommended Lessons and Courses for You

Lesson Transcript
Instructor: Jason Nowaczyk

Jason has a masters of education in educational psychology and a BA in history and a BA in philosophy. He's taught high school and middle school

The following lesson will compare the views of sociologists Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim and how they view a modern society. A short quiz will follow the lesson to check your understanding.

Durkheim & Marx on Modernity

Isn't it amazing that you're learning about something through a computer or mobile device screen right now? You're getting the information that was once reserved for the educated elite. In a more modern sense, you would have gotten this information by someone that needed to teach you in person by plopping a large textbook in front of you.

With the advent of technology, the society we currently live in is a modern one. It allows us to do things and improve upon a way of life that existed prior to these advancements. Two sociologists in particular see the move towards modernity, or the social patterns of society that resulted from large-scale industrialization, as a good thing.

However, they put their own unique twists of what exactly a move towards modernity enables a society to do. The two sociologists we will cover in this lesson are Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx.

Durkheim & the Division of Labor

Another great thing about living in a modern society is grocery shopping. At first, that probably doesn't sound like something great, but really, isn't it nice to go to the grocery store and pick up whatever you need to make dinner for that night? Or better yet, you can also go to your nearest fast food joint and order something to eat that's already made for you!

Imagine instead that if you wanted to make dinner, you had to raise the livestock and plants needed to feed yourself. This would be inconceivable to have to do every time you wanted a meal; and as a result, our society would look a lot different.

Luckily, with the advent of industrialization also came an increased division of labor, or specialized economic activity. This is the central point of sociologist Emile Durkheim's analysis of modernity. Durkheim viewed pre-modern societies as a time when everyone performed the same daily routines, whereas modern societies function by having people perform highly specific jobs.

Durkheim claimed that pre-modern societies were held together by mechanical solidarity, or shared sentiments and likeness, because everyone was pretty much doing the same thing. However, modern societies are held together by organic solidarity, or mutual dependency between people engaged in specialized work.

In modern societies, you could get more work done if you didn't have to do everything yourself, but rather had a system where people specialized in certain things and helped one another. For example, if you were to own a restaurant, you may be the best cook, but you wouldn't want to have to grow and raise your own food. Instead, chefs are able to buy meat and produce from farmers, and farmers, in turn, are able to go to restaurants to get a great meal.

Some people however felt that a move towards modernity, or a more 'natural'/'organic' system of social organization, would lead to a loss of meaningful bonds with people, which were largely characteristic of small villages. However, Durkheim instead saw organic modernization not as the loss of community, but rather a change from a community based on bonds of likeness, to a community based on economic interdependence. Durkheim viewed the mechanical solidarity of pre-modernity not as some whimsical value, but rather as something that kept society stagnant and too regimented.

That's not to say that Durkheim viewed modernity as perfect. While Durkheim was pretty optimistic about the effects of modernity, he did still fear anomie, a condition in which society provides little moral guidance to individuals. With society becoming so diverse and specialized, Durkheim felt that things might begin working too well and at the cost of our humanity. Durkheim did warn for modern societies to keep their strong moral norms and values, and not to become egocentric in placing their own needs above those of others. This, he believed, would lead to finding little purpose in life.

To unlock this lesson you must be a Member.
Create your account

Register to view this lesson

Are you a student or a teacher?

Unlock Your Education

See for yourself why 30 million people use

Become a member and start learning now.
Become a Member  Back
What teachers are saying about
Try it risk-free for 30 days

Earning College Credit

Did you know… We have over 200 college courses that prepare you to earn credit by exam that is accepted by over 1,500 colleges and universities. You can test out of the first two years of college and save thousands off your degree. Anyone can earn credit-by-exam regardless of age or education level.

To learn more, visit our Earning Credit Page

Transferring credit to the school of your choice

Not sure what college you want to attend yet? has thousands of articles about every imaginable degree, area of study and career path that can help you find the school that's right for you.

Create an account to start this course today
Try it risk-free for 30 days!
Create an account