Cruel and Unusual Punishment Amendment: Definition & Examples

Instructor: Jason Nowaczyk
The following lesson covers a section of the 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution regarding cruel and unusual punishment. A short quiz will follow the lesson to check your understanding.


Imagine when you were young. Chances are that if you did something wrong or broke a rule, you would have been punished either by a parent or guardian, or perhaps from someone at school. Say for instance that the rule you broke was eating a cookie before dinner when your parents expressly forbid the eating of sweets before dinner. As a result, the punishment was a harsh spanking followed by being sent to your room without dinner and without the ability to leave the room. By some people's standards, especially those who are much older, this method of punishment is perfectly acceptable. Contemporary parents, however, might find that this punishment is much too harsh in relation to the 'crime'.

The 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution states that excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. What constitutes cruel and unusual punishment is not starkly defined, but in general, this clause encompasses particular punishments considered inhumane by society. In other words, the cruel and unusual punishment clause prevents the government from imposing a penalty that is either barbaric or far too severe for the crime committed.

The Origin of Cruel and Unusual Punishment

In medieval England and even later in colonial America, punishments for certain crimes could have included being burned in hot oil, crucifixion, loss of limbs, or being drawn and quartered. In modern American times, the United States has had no less than five ways in which you could be put to death.

The original ban on cruel and unusual punishment is thought to have come from the English Declaration of Rights of 1689, which was later adopted by the United States framers of the Constitution. However, the vagueness of the term cruel and unusual has led to some intense debate in the Supreme Court over the years.

Punishment by Burning at the Stake
Portrait Burning at the Stake

Determining 'Cruel and Unusual'

The Supreme Court takes into account a few factors when determining what cruel and unusual punishment means. These include contemporary ideals of a society, proportionality, arbitrariness, and the characteristics of the criminal.

Contemporary Societal Ideals

Clearly, punishment that is considered usual, or expected, today could have been different in another time period. During the Salem Witch trials, it was common for offenders accused of practicing witchcraft to be hung, while today, many people find that practice barbaric. To solve this issue, the Supreme Court ruled in 1958, in the case of Trop v. Dulles, that the notion of cruel and unusual should change over time to reflect a society's 'evolving sense of decency'.

To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account

Register for a free trial

Are you a student or a teacher?
I am a teacher

Unlock Your Education

See for yourself why 30 million people use Study.com

Become a Study.com member and start learning now.
Become a Member  Back

Earning College Credit

Did you know… We have over 95 college courses that prepare you to earn credit by exam that is accepted by over 2,000 colleges and universities. You can test out of the first two years of college and save thousands off your degree. Anyone can earn credit-by-exam regardless of age or education level.

To learn more, visit our Earning Credit Page

Transferring credit to the school of your choice

Not sure what college you want to attend yet? Study.com has thousands of articles about every imaginable degree, area of study and career path that can help you find the school that's right for you.

Create an account to start this course today
Try it free for 5 days!
Create An Account