Culture and Anarchy by Matthew Arnold: Summary & Analysis

Culture and Anarchy by Matthew Arnold: Summary & Analysis
Coming up next: Doublethink in 1984: Definition & Examples

You're on a roll. Keep up the good work!

Take Quiz Watch Next Lesson
 Replay
Your next lesson will play in 10 seconds
  • 1:19 Arnold's Definition of Culture
  • 2:01 Arnold's Function of the State
  • 2:46 Arnold's View on Philistines
  • 3:31 Hebraism Vs. Hellenism
  • 4:37 Arnold's Philosophy in…
  • 5:18 Lesson Summary
Add to Add to Add to

Want to watch this again later?

Log in or sign up to add this lesson to a Custom Course.

Log in or Sign up

Timeline
Autoplay
Autoplay
Speed

Recommended Lessons and Courses for You

Lesson Transcript
Instructor: Leslie McMurtry
In this lesson, we'll look at Matthew Arnold's 'Culture and Anarchy,' a social and political critique that explains Arnold's understanding of the concept of culture and why society needed it. Following our summary and analysis, you can test your knowledge with a quiz!

Background to Arnold and His Ideas

Matthew Arnold (1822-1888) was one of the most well-known British political and poetical writers in his lifetime. Although he is now known primarily for his poetry, he was most provocative in his own Victorian society through his criticism and political writing. Culture and Anarchy, (1867-9) a long series of essays written by Arnold, was a political and social critique. Arnold's work as an inspector of schools had brought him into contact with European thought, and from this, he based much of his criticism of British society. British society, he believed, was parochial and overemphasized the Protestant work ethic and money-making. He helped popularize the phrase 'Philistinism' in English (by Philistine, he means someone who is ignorant of culture and arts). Culture and Anarchy was highly influential, particularly so in the twentieth century with John Reith, the man who established the British Broadcasting Corporation's (or better known as the BBC) guiding ethos, its concepts of culture, and how to share it.

Culture and Anarchy consists of six sections plus an introduction and a conclusion.

Arnold's Definition of Culture

Arnold spends a lot of space explaining his idea of culture and how it differs from that of his critics'. To him, culture is a study in perfection, in making things better than they are, moved by the moral and social passion for doing good. He notes that religion suggests that the kingdom of God is within you, so culture places perfection in an internal condition. Furthermore, this has to be a collective movement. The system that Arnold criticized taught, he believed, that a man values himself on how much of a commercial success he could be, rather than on who he 'is.' To Arnold, culture is 'sweetness and light,' although these terms in themselves need definition.

Arnold's Function of the State

Light, as Arnold defines it, is intelligence as a component of perfection. Arnold is worth quoting directly here, 'Our prevalent notion is . . . that it is a most happy and important thing for a man merely to be able to do as he likes. On what he is to do when he is thus free to do as he likes, we do not lay so much stress.' Arnold believed that this philosophy, the assertion of personal liberty, was such an important part of British life and was bringing society closer, in fact, to anarchy. To fix this problem, he believed the State was necessary. A system of complete liberty, he argued, could not regulate itself. Therefore, society needs the State to prevent its descent into anarchy.

Arnold's Views on Philistines

Earlier, Arnold argued that the pursuit of culture must be a collective movement. This philosophy, he argued, was at odds with the strong sense of individualism in Victorian British society, 'every man for himself.' Arnold believed that wealth is mere machinery and not greatness, and the people who believe otherwise are what he terms 'Philistines.' Arnold, seeing himself as a member of the middle class, believed that they were made up by and large by Philistines. However, he did not believe that any of the classes (the aristocracy, the middle class, and the working class) were right and the others were wrong. He believed the function of the State was to use the best ideas of all the classes. He also believed that his own society should not be afraid to look at other country's systems of governing.

To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account

Register to view this lesson

Are you a student or a teacher?

Unlock Your Education

See for yourself why 30 million people use Study.com

Become a Study.com member and start learning now.
Become a Member  Back
What teachers are saying about Study.com
Try it risk-free for 30 days

Earning College Credit

Did you know… We have over 200 college courses that prepare you to earn credit by exam that is accepted by over 1,500 colleges and universities. You can test out of the first two years of college and save thousands off your degree. Anyone can earn credit-by-exam regardless of age or education level.

To learn more, visit our Earning Credit Page

Transferring credit to the school of your choice

Not sure what college you want to attend yet? Study.com has thousands of articles about every imaginable degree, area of study and career path that can help you find the school that's right for you.

Create an account to start this course today
Try it risk-free for 30 days!
Create An Account
Support