# Decision Making: Process & Models

An error occurred trying to load this video.

Try refreshing the page, or contact customer support.

Coming up next: Decision Making: Definition & Types

### You're on a roll. Keep up the good work!

Replay
Your next lesson will play in 10 seconds
• 0:03 The Rational Model
• 0:55 Decision-Making Process Steps
• 4:33 Strengths & Weaknesses…
• 5:44 Lesson Summary

Want to watch this again later?

Timeline
Autoplay
Autoplay

#### Recommended Lessons and Courses for You

Lesson Transcript
Instructor: Sharon Linde
Have you noticed that some groups seem to work very well together when making decisions, and others seem unable to make decisions? This lesson discusses the process of making group decisions and various models associated with making decisions.

## The Rational Model

Bob works with a team on a weekly basis as a volunteer at his church group. He and the other volunteers come together to discuss information and make decisions. Although Bob often disagrees with the decisions, he recognizes he is part of the group and must be willing to sacrifice his opinions, at least some of the time.

Depending on the situation, there are an incredible number of ways that individuals can make decisions. These range from the completely rational to picking a solution at random, with emotional and intuitive pieces thrown in as well. While all of these ways of making decisions have counterparts in group decision-making, we are only going to discuss the rational model here. The rational decision-making model incorporates a wide array of objective information and data into the decision-making process.

Although people don't use the the rational model very often, it's by far the most used model for group decisions. As we will see in this lesson, our human emotions and social relationships will still affect the rational decision-making process.

## Decision-Making Process Steps

When Bob and his team sit down to make a decision, they go through a few predictable steps. What are the steps in the rational model? Not all models look the same; they range from four to seven steps. The only difference here really is the level of detail - all of these models are describing the same basic process.

Bob's team uses the following process:

• Identification of the problem or goal
• Identification of criteria and importance of those criteria
• Generate alternatives
• Gather evidence and evaluate alternatives
• Select 'best' alternative
• Evaluation of the solution

Let's follow Bob and his church group as they figure out how to improve traffic flow outside their church on Sunday mornings because they're receiving complaints from the non-attending neighbors. We'll go through each of the steps we laid out a moment ago, one at a time, and explore how they are related to our group's decision-making process.

### Step 1: Goal Identification

The first thing to do when making a decision is to decide what goal you are reaching for or what problem needs to be solved. In our example, is the proper goal to minimize the length of time traffic is impeded or to limit how many lanes are blocked? Framing this initial question affects all of the following steps and is a crucial part of the decision making process.

Our group decides to take a combination approach: the number of lanes blocked multiplied by the amount of time they are blocked.

### Step 2: Identification and Importance of Criteria

What are the items you are going to take into account when making this decision, and how important is each of them to the final decision? Evaluating a decision with two criteria, one of which is three times as important as the other, looks very different than evaluating a decision with five equally-weighted criteria.

In framing the question, our group has already chosen the two criteria and how they both weigh in the outcome: the length of time lanes are blocked and the number of lanes blocked.

### Step 3: Generating Alternatives

Here's when the brainstorming happens. What are all the possible alternatives that might get us to the solution? In our traffic issue, one possible solution would be to allow parking in all four lanes of traffic in front of the church. Another option would be to only block one lane in each direction, and a third option would be to block none of the lanes by using a remote parking location with a shuttle, which would be less convenient to attendees.

### Step 4: Gather Evidence and Evaluate Alternatives

Once possible alternative solutions have been identified, it's time to weigh them against your selected criteria. On three successive Sundays, our group takes measurements of how long lanes are blocked, with results listed in this table:

Alternative Lanes Blocked Hours Product
All lanes 4 2 8
Half 2 2.25 4.5
None 1 2.5 2.5

As we can see, when all lanes are used as an option, four lanes are blocked for 2 hours and the product is 8. When the alternative of half the lanes, 2 of them in this case, are being blocked for 2.5 hours, the product is 4.5, and when none of the lanes are blocked except 1 for 2.5 hours, the product is also 2.5. What will the group decide?

To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.

### Register for a free trial

Are you a student or a teacher?

#### See for yourself why 30 million people use Study.com

##### Become a Study.com member and start learning now.
Back
What teachers are saying about Study.com

### Earning College Credit

Did you know… We have over 160 college courses that prepare you to earn credit by exam that is accepted by over 1,500 colleges and universities. You can test out of the first two years of college and save thousands off your degree. Anyone can earn credit-by-exam regardless of age or education level.