As a member, you'll also get unlimited access to over 79,000 lessons in math, English, science, history, and more. Plus, get practice tests, quizzes, and personalized coaching to help you succeed.
Try it risk-freeAlready registered? Log in here for access
Suppose that you wanted to find a fruit to eat. You look through the refrigerator and find a celery stick, a Granny Smith, and a cup of beans. You know that neither celery nor beans are fruits. You also know that all apples are fruits, and a Granny Smith is an apple. Therefore, the Granny Smith has to be a fruit.
This is an example of syllogism, a form of deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning is a type of logic where general statements, or premises, are used to form a specific conclusion. The other type of deductive reasoning is conditional reasoning.
Syllogisms are deductive arguments that are written in the form:
A is B
C is A
Therefore, C is B
Let's take the example above. If we broke down the syllogism into premises and conclusions, we would get:
Premise: All apples are fruits.
Premise: A Granny Smith is an apple.
Conclusion: Therefore, a Granny Smith is a fruit.
According to the first premise, all items that are classified as apples are also classified as fruits. According to the second premise, Granny Smith is classified as an apple. The first premise is a general statement, while the second premise refers to a specific case. The conclusion says that a Granny Smith has to be a fruit because of its inherent properties as an apple. This deductive argument is also valid, which means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises. So, does a valid deductive argument mean that the premises and conclusions are true? Suppose I formed this deductive argument:
Premise: All dogs have long ears.
Premise: Puddles is a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, Puddles has long ears.
Given the premises that all dogs have long ears and Puddles is a dog, it is logical to assume that Puddles has long ears. After all, in this example, long ears are an inherent quality of dogs. The argument is valid. Does that mean it is also true?
Not all dogs have long ears. Certain breeds, like Yorkies or pugs, have small ears. Because the conclusions are based off the premises and one of the premises is not true, it follows that the conclusion is not true, even though it is valid. You can see from this example that if one of the premises is not true, the conclusion is also not true.
So what is conditional reasoning? Conditional reasoning uses if-then statements that are true to form a true conclusion. The conclusion can be either valid or invalid, even though the premises are true.
This chart shows the four types of conditional reasoning:
 |
You can see that affirming the antecedent and denying the consequent are the only valid forms of conditional reasoning. That is, the conclusions logically follow from the premises.
Let's look at the example of affirming the consequent. We know that a Yorkie is a type of dog. However, we also know that there are other types of dogs beside Yorkies. Therefore, the conclusion that if it is a dog, then it is a Yorkie is false, even though the premises are true.
Let's look at the example of denying the antecedent. Just because it is not a Yorkie, it does not follow that it is not a dog. For example, it could be a poodle, which would still classify as a type of dog. Because a Yorkie is only one of several possibilities that could be classified as a dog, the conclusion is incorrect.
Deductive reasoning is a type of logical argument that involves drawing conclusions from premises. Syllogisms and conditional reasoning are the two types of deductive reasoning. There are four types of conditional reasoning, but only affirming the antecedent and denying the consequent are valid. Affirming the consequent and denying the antecedent are invalid forms of conditional reasoning.
When you are finished, you should be able to:
To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account
For this activity, respond to the following short-answer essay questions about deductive reasoning. Since these are short-answer questions, your responses should be focused and concise. Writing two to three well-developed paragraphs with specific details is preferred for this type of essay question.
Questions:
A possible response to Question #1:
A syllogism is a type of deductive reasoning that follows a specific pattern. This pattern contains two premises and a conclusion. The first premise is a general statement, and the second premise is more specific. These two premises help create the conclusion. However, both premises need to be true statements in order for the conclusion to also be true.
Here is an example of a true syllogism: All mammals are animals. All dolphins are mammals. Therefore, all dolphins are animals. Since both of the premises are true, the conclusion is also true. However, if the first premise were untrue, then the conclusion would also be untrue.
Already a member? Log In
BackAlready registered? Log in here for access
Did you know… We have over 200 college courses that prepare you to earn credit by exam that is accepted by over 1,500 colleges and universities. You can test out of the first two years of college and save thousands off your degree. Anyone can earn credit-by-exam regardless of age or education level.
To learn more, visit our Earning Credit Page
Not sure what college you want to attend yet? Study.com has thousands of articles about every imaginable degree, area of study and career path that can help you find the school that's right for you.
Back To Course
ACT Prep: Practice & Study Guide44 chapters | 366 lessons | 23 flashcard sets
{{courseNav.course.topics.length}} chapters | {{courseNav.course.mDynamicIntFields.lessonCount}} lessons | {{course.flashcardSetCount}} flashcard set{{course.flashcardSetCoun > 1 ? 's' : ''}}
