Differences Between Fact & Opinion in Historical Narratives

Instructor: Nate Sullivan

Nate Sullivan holds a M.A. in History and a M.Ed. He is an adjunct history professor, middle school history teacher, and freelance writer.

In this lesson, we will examine the difference between fact and opinion in historical narratives. We will identify examples of each, and we will see how both have a place in historical narratives.

Understanding Fact and Opinion

Hang on tight because we're going to be digging into some pretty deep stuff here today!

At first glance, this topic would appear pretty basic and elementary, but you know how sometimes the more you discuss something, the more complex it becomes? Yep, that is what is going to take place as we discuss this topic. We're going to look at the difference between fact and opinion in historical narratives.

Hopefully, most of us have some basic sense of the difference between fact and opinion. A fact is something that is unchanging and can be objectively verified. For example, 'the earth revolves around the sun' is a fact. Other facts would include:

  • Human beings walk on two legs.
  • A square is composed of four sides.
  • 5 + 2 = 7

An opinion is subjective, and is one person's particular view. Examples of opinion include:

  • Pizza is the most delicious food.
  • Barack Obama is a fantastic president.
  • Cats are annoying.

Historical Fact

Some people may not realize it, but the discipline of history contains both fact and opinion. Before we get to the opinion part, let's discuss historical fact first.

Obviously history should be factual. That is what history is: the factual account of past events. For example, we know for certain George Washington was from Virginia. We know for a fact the Berlin Wall came down in 1989. These historical facts are indisputable. They can be verified. So how are historical facts verified? Well, in the case of George Washington, there is documentation to prove he was from Virginia. You know, legal documents, like birth certificates, marriage licenses, land deeds, etc. You can also go in person to his house, Mount Vernon, to see with your own eyes, where he lived. People who were alive at the same time as Washington also verified this in their writings. Historical evidence proves this.

This image from 1796 depicts Mount Vernon with the Washington family on the front terrace. This is an example of a primary source, and it verifies the historical fact that Washington lived in Virginia.

Historical evidence usually exists in the form of primary sources. Primary sources consist of documents, objects, and other physical pieces of historical evidence that were created during the time being examined. Examples of primary sources would include:

  • A sword from the Middle Ages
  • The original Declaration of Independence
  • Film footage from World War II
  • A propaganda poster from the 1920s
  • An original pamphlet explaining the purpose of the American Revolution

Hopefully, you get the idea. Primary sources differ from secondary sources. Secondary sources contain information based on research, but not from firsthand knowledge. So if a professor wrote about Napoleon, this would be a secondary source.

Let's go back to the Berlin Wall. It came down in 1989. This is a historical fact. How do we know? We have primary sources. We have people who were actually there who can verify this fact and tell us all about it. We have photographs and film footage of the event. We can even see pieces of the wall on display.

The bottom line here is this: historical fact is objective and can be verified. Most of what we consider 'history' is based on fact, and rightly so. Historical facts include:

  • The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand led to World War I.
  • The Union won the Civil War.
  • 'Flappers' were common during the 1920s.
  • Harry Truman won the election of 1948.

Historical Opinion

So where does historical opinion come in? Here is where it gets very tricky. Sometimes historical fact can only tell us so much, and historians find it necessary to develop opinions to fill in the gaps. Usually, these opinions answer questions of 'how?' and 'why?' For example, how did feminism affect the 'flappers' of the 1920s? The opinions developed by historians are probably more correctly called interpretations. Now pay attention here! Interpretations are based on fact but are not fact themselves. Examples of historical interpretations include:

To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account

Register to view this lesson

Are you a student or a teacher?

Unlock Your Education

See for yourself why 30 million people use Study.com

Become a Study.com member and start learning now.
Become a Member  Back
What teachers are saying about Study.com
Try it risk-free for 30 days

Earning College Credit

Did you know… We have over 200 college courses that prepare you to earn credit by exam that is accepted by over 1,500 colleges and universities. You can test out of the first two years of college and save thousands off your degree. Anyone can earn credit-by-exam regardless of age or education level.

To learn more, visit our Earning Credit Page

Transferring credit to the school of your choice

Not sure what college you want to attend yet? Study.com has thousands of articles about every imaginable degree, area of study and career path that can help you find the school that's right for you.

Create an account to start this course today
Try it risk-free for 30 days!
Create an account