ELL Court Cases

An error occurred trying to load this video.

Try refreshing the page, or contact customer support.

Coming up next: Arizona English Language Proficiency Standards

You're on a roll. Keep up the good work!

Take Quiz Watch Next Lesson
 Replay
Your next lesson will play in 10 seconds
  • 0:04 English Language Learners
  • 0:43 Meyer v. Nebraska (1923)
  • 1:51 Mendez v. Westminster (1947)
  • 3:03 Lau v. Nichols (1974)
  • 4:27 Lesson Summary
Add to Add to Add to

Want to watch this again later?

Log in or sign up to add this lesson to a Custom Course.

Login or Sign up

Timeline
Autoplay
Autoplay
Speed

Recommended Lessons and Courses for You

Lesson Transcript
Instructor: Leigh Bond

Leigh has taught literacy skills and English Language Arts to adult basic education and high school learners. She has a law degree and a bachelor's in history.

This lesson provides an overview of the major court cases that have made an impact on English language learners (ELLs). The cases covered include Meyer v. Nebraska, Mendez v. Westminster, and Lau v. Nichols.

English Language Learners

English language learner ('ELL' for short) is a term often used to describe a K-12 student whose first language is not English. An estimated 10 percent of the public school population in the United States speaks another language at home. Spanish and Asian languages are the most widely spoken first languages of many ELLs, but ELLs speak over 400 different languages in total. The cases we'll cover in this video illustrate that, regardless of the languages spoken by an English language learner, all ELLs need language support to help them succeed in school and beyond.

Meyer v. Nebraska (1923)

Schools and states don't always agree about how to best support ELLs. When disagreements happen, parents, teachers, and/or ELLs themselves often have to sue in the U.S. Supreme Court. The first U.S. Supreme Court case involving ELLs was Meyer v. Nebraska (1923). The state of Nebraska banned faculty from teaching any other language besides English. Nebraska insisted that the purpose of the state law was to promote civic development and assimilation, or the immersion of immigrants into American society. A teacher broke this law by reading in German to a student.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the Nebraska law because the justices deemed it unconstitutional, in that it violated the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution which in part states, '[no state shall] deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.' The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Nebraska's intent to assimilate English Language Learners did not outweigh a parent's right to control the education of their child, a child's right to learn, and a teacher's right to teach.

To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account

Register to view this lesson

Are you a student or a teacher?

Unlock Your Education

See for yourself why 30 million people use Study.com

Become a Study.com member and start learning now.
Become a Member  Back
What teachers are saying about Study.com
Try it risk-free for 30 days

Earning College Credit

Did you know… We have over 160 college courses that prepare you to earn credit by exam that is accepted by over 1,500 colleges and universities. You can test out of the first two years of college and save thousands off your degree. Anyone can earn credit-by-exam regardless of age or education level.

To learn more, visit our Earning Credit Page

Transferring credit to the school of your choice

Not sure what college you want to attend yet? Study.com has thousands of articles about every imaginable degree, area of study and career path that can help you find the school that's right for you.

Create an account to start this course today
Try it risk-free for 30 days!
Create An Account
Support