Groups, Mobs & Teams in Organizations

An error occurred trying to load this video.

Try refreshing the page, or contact customer support.

Coming up next: Types of Work Teams: Functional, Cross-Functional & Self-Directed

You're on a roll. Keep up the good work!

Take Quiz Watch Next Lesson
Your next lesson will play in 10 seconds
  • 0:04 Managing Cooperative Efforts
  • 0:53 Groups
  • 1:54 Mobs
  • 3:08 Teams
  • 5:14 Lesson Summary
Save Save Save

Want to watch this again later?

Log in or sign up to add this lesson to a Custom Course.

Log in or Sign up

Speed Speed

Recommended Lessons and Courses for You

Lesson Transcript
Instructor: Sherri Hartzell

Sherri has taught college business and communication courses. She also holds three degrees including communications, business, educational leadership/technology.

Why do some organizations work together better than others? It turns out that not all groups are teams, and not all teams are groups. This lesson explains the different categories of employees found in organizations, including groups, mobs, and teams.

Managing Cooperative Efforts

As a manager, it is your job to assess, develop, and support cooperative efforts among the individuals you manage. By holding a leadership position, you are assumed to have all of the authority, influence, and power that you need in order to make that happen, but are you really in charge? If so, then why is the process of creating effective teams so challenging for some managers? The simple answer to this question lies in the complex characteristics of a truly effective work team, many of which can be confusing to the untrained eye. This lesson will discuss the three categories of employees of which managers ought to be aware, including groups, mobs, and teams.


A group is a collection of two or more people who interact with one another but have no unified purpose. The group is the most common assortment of individuals in an organization; however, without a common purpose and commitment to group success, this group will never become a team. Many people take for granted the cohesion that occurs in teams and assume factors such as proximity, communication, and social exchanges will inevitably allow an effective team to emerge. To the contrary, for a group to become a team it must in fact have that common purpose, shared vision, and commitment to group and organizational success. Members of a team work hard to achieve organizational goals, often times going above and beyond what is expected of them. Group members uphold the status quo, but not enough to make a significant difference.


Mobs have a negative purpose within an organization
Mob Example

A mob is a collection of two or more people who interact with one another, but unlike a group, mobs do have a unified, negative purpose. Mob members are calculated, purposeful, and unified in their efforts. Activities of mobs are typically aimed at changing, challenging, or sabotaging the traditional order of things within an organization. Mobs will rationalize their disruptive and vicious methods by creating the belief that their actions are the solution to mob members' problems.

For example, a group of employees might form a mob to protest a policy that limits the amount of time they are allowed to leave their desks to use the restroom. The mob believes the policy is unfair and needs to be changed, but because more peaceful methods of trying to get the policy changed have not worked, the mob decides to chain themselves to the bathroom stalls, preventing management from using the facilities when they need to during the course of the workday. The mob believes their actions are justified even though they are clearly disruptive.


A team is a collection of two or more people who interact with one another for a common, positive purpose. Teams are made of individuals whose collective competence and experience is greater than any one individual can offer.

As previously mentioned, however, teams are not easily formed because they must be planned, supported, and led. Building an effective team requires a leader who can foster an environment where members can interact regularly, coordinate work efforts, engage in healthy conflict, and analyze relationships between team members. The main difference between groups and teams is the manner in which work gets done. Group members act as individuals in their efforts, accountability, and leadership; team members act as a cohesive unit whereby they share work responsibilities, create mutual accountability for results, and divide up leadership roles.

Importance difference between groups and teams
Group Members Vs. Team Members

To unlock this lesson you must be a Member.
Create your account

Register to view this lesson

Are you a student or a teacher?

Unlock Your Education

See for yourself why 30 million people use

Become a member and start learning now.
Become a Member  Back
What teachers are saying about
Try it risk-free for 30 days

Earning College Credit

Did you know… We have over 200 college courses that prepare you to earn credit by exam that is accepted by over 1,500 colleges and universities. You can test out of the first two years of college and save thousands off your degree. Anyone can earn credit-by-exam regardless of age or education level.

To learn more, visit our Earning Credit Page

Transferring credit to the school of your choice

Not sure what college you want to attend yet? has thousands of articles about every imaginable degree, area of study and career path that can help you find the school that's right for you.

Create an account to start this course today
Try it risk-free for 30 days!
Create an account