Laura has a Masters of Science in Food Science and Human Nutrition and has taught college Science.
Juror 12 Background
How would you feel if you were chosen to be on jury duty for a murder case? How would you like to make that decision of life or death for another person? Would you fight for justice and ensure there were no prejudices? Juror 12 just wants to get out of court as quickly as possible.
Juror 12 works for a marketing agency. He doesn't really understand people; instead what makes the most sense to him are graphs and figures. All that he really cares about is getting a decision made and getting out of the room. He doesn't pay much attention to the discussions and is doodling through the entire proceedings.
Sometimes this attitude leads him to act as a peacemaker, trying to stop fights so that they can get back to the business at hand. It also leads him to change his opinion frequently, seemingly to whichever vote seems to get them out of there quickly.
An error occurred trying to load this video.
Try refreshing the page, or contact customer support.
You must cCreate an account to continue watching
Register to view this lesson
As a member, you'll also get unlimited access to over 83,000 lessons in math, English, science, history, and more. Plus, get practice tests, quizzes, and personalized coaching to help you succeed.
Get unlimited access to over 83,000 lessons.Try it now
Already registered? Log in here for accessBack
Juror 12 as Peacemaker
When the first vote is taken and Juror 8 gives the verdict ''not guilty,'' this causes everyone to start lashing out at Juror 8 wondering how he could possibly think he is not guilty. All of the facts seem to point to this boy's guilt. Yet he, Juror 8, votes not guilty. It soon becomes obvious that they aren't getting anywhere.
Juror 12 doesn't participate in this heated discussion. The most he ever adds to the debate are comments such as ''If you look at the graphs...'' As a marketing agent, graphs and figures are typically how he makes decisions. He doesn't need to think about how people react; instead he makes decisions based on what the figures tell him. This is the same way that he decides to go about making the decision of guilty or not guilty.
Juror 12 is doodling through the debate and doesn't even say anything until someone directly asks him what he's doing. Then Juror 12 finally gives his first idea to try and lead to a quicker decision and more peace. He says, ''Maybe if we each took a minute or two'' to convince Juror 8 that he is wrong and they are all right. He is trying to put some order and find a way to efficiently convince Juror 8 to vote guilty.
This seems to be a good idea, and so they proceed. Yet it still leads to disagreements and arguments. Juror 12 doesn't say much, except when they seem to be getting too far off topic. He makes sure everyone knows whose turn it is in the ''two-minute convincing'' in order to keep things moving forward.
When things start getting too heated, he always attempts to ease the situation. This could be because he doesn't like disagreements or simply because he knows that the longer they argue the longer the process will take.
Juror 12 Is Wishy-Washy
Juror 12 votes ''guilty'' for the first few votes. Yet we never really hear his reasoning as to why he believes the boy is guilty. He mentions facts and figures, but he never goes into detail for his reasoning. Once the vote starts looking more even, we really start seeing him become wishy-washy. He even changes his vote mid-vote.
In the end he votes ''not guilty'' with everyone else. Yet, we never really know if he actually thinks the boy is not guilty or guilty or if he is just voting along with everyone else.
This wishy-washy nature of Juror 12 really makes us realize that he doesn't care about this case. He might think it's interesting, but he does not ever take his role seriously, which involves holding this boy's life in his hands.
Juror 12 doesn't play a big role in 12 Angry Men and speaks very little. Yet his wishy-washy nature says a lot about how we might view sentencing others. Do we really care about how we sentence other people, or do we simply do whatever seems easiest at the moment?
In 12 Angry Men, Juror 12 can serve as peacemaker but seems to just not care about the life that they could be setting free or sentencing to death. He goes along with the flow in order to get done with the deliberations as quickly as possible. Even his attempts at peacemaking seem to be more of an attempt to be done sooner. His job as a marketing agent leads him to make decisions based solely on graphs and figures. When the debate leads more to a personal note, he does not have anything to add.
To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account
Register to view this lesson
Unlock Your Education
See for yourself why 30 million people use Study.com
Become a Study.com member and start learning now.Become a Member
Already a member? Log InBack
Juror 12 in 12 Angry Men: Character Analysis
Related Study Materials
Explore our library of over 83,000 lessons
- College Courses
- High School Courses
- Other Courses
- Create a Goal
- Create custom courses
- Get your questions answered