Back To CourseTopics in Sociology
8 chapters | 89 lessons
As a member, you'll also get unlimited access to over 75,000 lessons in math, English, science, history, and more. Plus, get practice tests, quizzes, and personalized coaching to help you succeed.Try it risk-free
The political scene in the United States has shifted considerably over the past few decades. Conservative members of the electorate want to maintain a certain status quo, while liberals are more open to progressive change. Where the division began is open to debate, but the Great Depression, the Civil Rights Movement, and other shifts in public thinking have demonstrated a clear divide within the United States. While there are those in the U.S. who think of this as a new phenomenon, people have been writing about and acting on political and class division, or the financial divide that exists between those who make different amounts of money, for centuries.
The current political divide within both the major parties can be seen as a conflict between the haves and the have-nots. One group considers itself disenfranchised by the political establishment, while the establishment tries to win votes by reminding potential voters what it has accomplished in the past. Karl Marx, the prominent philosopher who's credited with creating communism, saw this kind of conflict (disenfranchised versus establishment) as a class struggle. His ideas had to do with economics, but those ideas ultimately had just as much to do with politics.
A class of people is a group that shares common characteristics. Generally, they have a similar socioeconomic status, which is based on income and living situation. Status has nothing to do with racial or ethnic similarity, although Marx reasoned that race or ethnicity was sometimes a factor. The commonality was tied to a group's ability or inability to wield economic or political power. The group that held the power would always try to maintain and grow that power by keeping those who had no power in a constant state of powerlessness. So, those who had no power allowed themselves to be exploited by the powerful in the form of set wages and conditions, because they had no other recourse. It was essentially a paradox. Imagine an ant colony being stepped on by a person. It has no recourse but to be stepped on because it's powerless to stop the massive foot coming down on top of the colony.
Karl Marx believed that in any system there were two types of people: the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. The proletariat consists of the working, or labor, class. The bourgeoisie can be through of as the idle, or management, class. In Karl Marx's theory of class conflict, he provided very clear definitions for these two classes. To understand Marx's stance in social history, we need to look at the two groups he believed made up every society.
The proletariat produces and the bourgeoisie exploits the producers based on their ability to market and sell. In an agrarian, or farming-based, society, the proletariat are the farming families who work hard to grow crops or raise animals. The bourgeoisie are the people who pay the farmers a small and inadequate amount of money for their products and sell them at a much larger profit. In an industrial society, or factory-based and machine-based society, the bourgeoisie owns the means of production (the factory) and exploits the proletariat by making them work for low wages in dangerous conditions.
Karl Marx used words like 'exploit' when speaking of how the rich managed the poor. Although some people would disagree with his inflammatory take on the proletariat and bourgeoisie classes, he said that capitalistic societies were indeed based on this type of arrangement. Some people have money, either through an inheritance or other means by which they gained wealth, whereas other people are destined to remain oppressed. But Marx wasn't concerned with individual stories of this. He saw this as a societal issue.
Karl Marx also believed that the bourgeoisie kept the proletariat powerless through the use of cheap entertainment and liquor and religious fervor. In order to keep the proletariat happy in their condition, they needed to believe that struggle was noble (religion) and it was impossible to overcome the powerful (manipulation of the police force). Alternatively, the bourgeoisie could use alcohol and entertainment to keep the proletariat in a stupor so they wouldn't care about their situation.
Members of the proletariat would always remain powerless unless they found some means of distributing power equally. As we mentioned before, Karl Marx is famous for his economic system of communism, which is a system in which the proletariat control the means of production and there is no need for the bourgeoisie. In essence, Marx's solution was to give the laborer a say in how his or her labor was used. This idea was the foundation of labor unions in the marketplace, which gave individual workers the power to negotiate the terms of their labor as groups.
Karl Marx's idea was noble in that he envisioned workers being able to dictate what they would receive for their efforts, rather than being told what they had to accept. Labor unions have achieved success all over the world, and Marx's dreams have been realized, to an extent. Unfortunately, class struggle continues to be an issue in both the economic and political arenas, and the implementation of pure communism in societies has largely failed. In some cases, communist regimes were responsible for some of the worst crimes against humanity in the 20th century, such as the crimes committed by the Stalinist regime in the Soviet Union, like the gulag or forced labor camp system.
Karl Marx, the prominent philosopher credited with creating communism, believed that people were separated into two groups: those who had economic power and those who did not. The proletariat, or powerless working class, and the bourgeoisie, or powerful idle management class, were central to his theories about class division, the financial divide that separates people according to their monetary resources. Karl Marx believed that the proletariat and the bourgeoisie would always struggle with each other until the powerless were able to change their socioeconomic status, or income and living situation. His idea of the proletariat controlling what it produced led to the formation of labor unions, which gave individual workers the power to negotiate the terms of their labor as a group. By banding together, the powerless could demand changes in an exploitative system. Karl Marx also developed the theoretical basis of communism, a system in which the proletariat controls the means of production and there is no need for the bourgeoisie.
To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account
Already a member? Log InBack
Did you know… We have over 160 college courses that prepare you to earn credit by exam that is accepted by over 1,500 colleges and universities. You can test out of the first two years of college and save thousands off your degree. Anyone can earn credit-by-exam regardless of age or education level.
To learn more, visit our Earning Credit Page
Not sure what college you want to attend yet? Study.com has thousands of articles about every imaginable degree, area of study and career path that can help you find the school that's right for you.
Back To CourseTopics in Sociology
8 chapters | 89 lessons