O.J. Simpson Trial: Evidence, Summary & Timeline

Lesson Transcript
Instructor: Rachael Smith

Rachael has a background in secondary education and has practiced law for eight years.

The O.J. Simpson trial was a highly controversial trial of O.J. Simpson accused of the murder of his ex-wife and Ronald Goldman. Follow the timeline of events through the trial examining the evidence, and the greater context of the case to see its significance and controversy. Updated: 11/15/2021

Background of the Case

The arrest and trial of former NFL star O.J. Simpson for the murder of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown, and her friend, Ronald Goldman, created a media frenzy. Lawyers, witnesses, police detectives, and even Judge Lance Ito himself became celebrities by being a part of this highly publicized trial. Courtroom terms became common topics of conversation as millions of people followed the trial of the former Heisman trophy winner and celebrity.

An error occurred trying to load this video.

Try refreshing the page, or contact customer support.

Coming up next: Mistrial: Definition & Motions

You're on a roll. Keep up the good work!

Take Quiz Watch Next Lesson
Your next lesson will play in 10 seconds
  • 0:01 Background of the Case
  • 0:34 Timeline of the Trial
  • 2:53 Evidence Presented at Trial
  • 5:52 Lesson Summary
Save Save Save

Want to watch this again later?

Log in or sign up to add this lesson to a Custom Course.

Log in or Sign up

Speed Speed

Timeline of the Trial

On the morning of June 13, 1994, the bodies of Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman were found at Brown's apartment in the Brentwood neighborhood of Los Angeles.

The police began to investigate Brown's ex-husband, O.J. Simpson, a former NFL star, for the murders. On June 17th, an arrest warrant was issued, prompting Simpson to lead police on a low-speed chase in his white Ford Bronco before eventually being arrested. More than 95 million people watched this pursuit on live television, creating a high level of interest from the very beginning.

July 8, 1994 - The preliminary hearing, which is the court hearing that determines whether there is enough evidence for a person to be tried with the crime or crimes charged, concludes and the judge rules that there is enough evidence to proceed with trial.

September 26, 1994 - Voir dire begins. This is the process of selecting a jury.

November 3, 1994 - Jury selection is completed after nearly six weeks.

January 11, 1995 - Due to the heavy publicity of the case, the jury was sequestered, or kept separate from the public in order to avoid any influence on their decision-making.

January 23, 1995 - Opening statements began in the trial.

February 12, 1995 - In an unusual move, jurors are taken on a tour of the crime scene under heavy police presence. The motorcade of vehicles included the prosecution, defense team, Simpson himself, Judge Ito and his staff, as well as a limited number of reporters and news media personnel.

September 29, 1995 - Closing arguments begin and jury deliberations start three days later.

October 3, 1995 - The unanimous (meaning all jurors voted the same way) not guilty verdict was watched by more than 100 million people as it was seen live during a television broadcast.

Simpson was released from jail after spending sixteen months awaiting a verdict. Although he was found not guilty of the murders, a civil suit was filed against Simpson and he was ordered to pay $33.5 million to the families of Brown and Goldman.

Evidence Presented at Trial

If one word could describe the crime scene investigation at the Brown home, it would be: sloppy. At trial, the defense team questioned the reliability of the evidence presented piece by piece. Although a bloody fingerprint was found on the gate of the home, it was never collected or processed. This was not the only mistake in the evidence collection process.

Multiple pieces of evidence were placed into the same bag rather than in individual bags, contaminating any evidence collected.

Generally, when pictures are taken during crime scene collection, a well-known object like a dollar bill or a ruler is used to provide scale. None were used in the photographs taken at Brown's home.

Items were not properly cataloged, and evidence was bagged while still wet, preventing any evidence collection. A blanket was taken from the home to cover Brown's body, contaminating all evidence found on the body. Finally, police and crime scene technicians improperly walked around the crime scene and dragged blood all over the scene.

DNA evidence was not as familiar as it is today, but the defense wasted no time in explaining that all of these pieces of evidence were subject to cross-contamination. This is the process by which DNA evidence from one piece of evidence can be transferred to another by improper evidence collection techniques.

To unlock this lesson you must be a Member.
Create your account

Register to view this lesson

Are you a student or a teacher?

Unlock Your Education

See for yourself why 30 million people use

Become a member and start learning now.
Become a Member  Back
What teachers are saying about
Try it now
Create an account to start this course today
Used by over 30 million students worldwide
Create an account