Parol Evidence Rule: Definition, Examples & Purpose

An error occurred trying to load this video.

Try refreshing the page, or contact customer support.

Coming up next: Conditions in Contracts: Definition & Forms

You're on a roll. Keep up the good work!

Take Quiz Watch Next Lesson
Your next lesson will play in 10 seconds
  • 0:06 Making a Contract
  • 0:52 Parol Evidence Rule
  • 2:26 Four Corners
  • 2:56 Merger Clause
  • 4:12 Exceptions
  • 5:35 Lesson Summary
Add to Add to Add to

Want to watch this again later?

Log in or sign up to add this lesson to a Custom Course.

Login or Sign up

Create an account to start this course today
Try it free for 5 days!
Create An Account

Recommended Lessons and Courses for You

Lesson Transcript
Instructor: Ashley Dugger

Ashley is an attorney. She has taught and written various introductory law courses.

Often, a court will rule that a written contract represents the entire agreement between the parties. Other contract evidence won't be permitted or enforced. This is called the parol evidence rule. This lesson explains the rule and how it works.

Making a Contract

Ideally, when two parties make a contract, the complete and final agreement will be memorialized in the written document. Contracts don't have to be written, but when they are, the written contract should fully represent the parties' agreement. The written contract is legally enforceable. If one party fails to fulfill the terms of the contract, the other party may sue for compliance, or performance. This type of lawsuit is called a breach of contract.

When a court considers the breach of contract case, the court will look to the written contract. The written contract is the only evidence the court has in order to determine whether or not the parties complied with the terms of the agreement. Any extra evidence will complicate the court's task of enforcing the written contract.

Parol Evidence Rule

The parol evidence rule is a legal rule that applies to written contracts. Parol evidence is evidence pertaining to the agreement that isn't included in a written contract. Courts generally don't allow this extra evidence, because the court must determine the parties' intentions. The written contract is considered to be the best description of the parties' intentions.

The rule works like this:

  1. The parol evidence rule applies after the parties put their final agreement in writing.
  2. The parties have to intend that the written contract is complete and final.
  3. No parol, or extra evidence, will be allowed to contradict or modify the written contract.

For example, let's say that you and I agree that I'm going to build three custom birdhouses for you, and deliver them to you on March 1. You're going to pay me $50 per birdhouse. We sign and execute a written contract.

I deliver the birdhouses, but you don't pay me. I take you to court, and ask for my $150, plus I want an additional $50 penalty fee since you didn't pay me on time. The court will likely grant me the $150 you owe me, but our agreement didn't mention a penalty fee. Any evidence of a penalty fee is parol evidence. The court will only enforce the exact terms of our contract.

Four Corners

Courts generally apply the four corners rule. This is also sometimes referred to as the plain meaning rule. This means that the court will enforce the written contract just as it appears, as long as the contract appears to be complete and final. All contract terms must appear within the four corners of the paper on which the contract is written. Otherwise, a court won't enforce those contract terms.

Merger Clause

Many written contracts include a merger clause. This is a clause that declares that the written contract is the complete and final representation of the parties' agreement. A merger clause simply ensures that a court will follow the parol evidence rule.

For example, let's say that you and I execute a written contract that includes a merger agreement. Our contract actually says 'this agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties'. I'm going to build three custom birdhouses for you, and deliver them to you on March 1. You're going to pay me $50 per birdhouse.

After we execute this agreement, I realize I can't purchase the wood you want. I'm going to need a few extra weeks. You say that's fine, and we make a side agreement where we orally decide to change the terms of the contract. We decide that I'll deliver the birdhouses on March 15. Our side agreement wasn't included in the original written contract. Because this agreement contradicts the terms of the written contract, a court won't enforce it. A court will only enforce the exact terms of our written contract.

To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account

Register for a free trial

Are you a student or a teacher?
I am a teacher

Unlock Your Education

See for yourself why 30 million people use Study.com

Become a Study.com member and start learning now.
Become a Member  Back

Earning College Credit

Did you know… We have over 95 college courses that prepare you to earn credit by exam that is accepted by over 2,000 colleges and universities. You can test out of the first two years of college and save thousands off your degree. Anyone can earn credit-by-exam regardless of age or education level.

To learn more, visit our Earning Credit Page

Transferring credit to the school of your choice

Not sure what college you want to attend yet? Study.com has thousands of articles about every imaginable degree, area of study and career path that can help you find the school that's right for you.

Create an account to start this course today
Try it free for 5 days!
Create An Account