Copyright

Protecting Research Participants: Mandated & Federal Regulations

An error occurred trying to load this video.

Try refreshing the page, or contact customer support.

Coming up next: Using Animal Subjects in Research: Issues & Considerations

You're on a roll. Keep up the good work!

Take Quiz Watch Next Lesson
 Replay
Your next lesson will play in 10 seconds
  • 0:07 Protection By Law
  • 0:29 Mandated Reporting
  • 1:39 Oversight
  • 3:57 Laws
  • 4:49 Lesson Summary
Add to Add to Add to

Want to watch this again later?

Log in or sign up to add this lesson to a Custom Course.

Login or Sign up

Timeline
Autoplay
Autoplay

Recommended Lessons and Courses for You

Lesson Transcript
Instructor: Devin Kowalczyk

Devin has taught psychology and has a master's degree in clinical forensic psychology. He is working on his PhD.

How are laws and federal regulations protecting research participants? This lesson explores some of the ways people are protected from each other, themselves, and researchers when they are participants in a study.

Protection by Law

Researchers cannot put their subjects in harm's way. I know this sounds like a no-brainer, but sometimes the race to prove something outpaces the need to protect. This is the reason the government has stepped in and enacted certain laws and strictures to help ensure the participants are protected from the research as well as other sources of harm.

Mandated Reporting

Let's say you're a researcher examining the effects of emotions on study habits in young children. Your work involves interviewing children, and during one interview, a child admits that his parent hits him.

Psychological researchers are mandated reporters, which can be defined as individuals required to report to authorities abuse and neglect of vulnerable populations, as well as those in imminent danger. Vulnerable populations include children, elders, and dependent adults - basically any group that can't take care of themselves. Abuses can be physical, sexual, financial, and emotional.

Imminent danger is defined as immediate risk of harm. Often in psychology, this typically means suicidal or homicidal ideations. Ideations is a term used by psychologists as a way to encompass thoughts, feelings, and beliefs. The intention here is to protect those in danger. Research participants are varied and different, and in this wide net, researchers often find people who need protecting.

Oversight

Each research project must be approved by the researcher's Institutional Review Board, which is tasked with reviewing accurate information about the research proposal to ensure they protect human and animal rights and that they fall in line with federal, state, local, and ethical guidelines.

The Review Board acts as a gatekeeper for allowing or forbidding studies from occurring. Prior to research beginning, a researcher will submit his or her planned methodology for the research to the Review Board. The Board will then determine if there is a heightened level of risk and if so, how it is to be mitigated. If there is minimal risk or the high risk is negated, then a research proposal is given the green light.

If a researcher does not follow his or her own methodology, then they run the risk of being reported to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Why would a study go off methodology? Sometimes in the process of a study, a researcher may find something really interesting and want to look at it in more depth.

In the previous example about interviewing kids about study habits and emotions, what if something like eye color, gender, or number of freckles became strongly correlated with grades? If the researcher then decides to focus on these areas that weren't outlined in the methodology, that introduces a risk of being reported. These aren't big things that will likely get one reported, but they might be.

Real examples of things that might get a researcher reported include, but are not limited to:

  • Not obtaining a subject's informed consent prior to participation
  • Failing to document a subject's informed consent
  • Using language that participants would not understand to describe the research
  • Performing studies on fetuses or newborns without prior animal research to back up the theory
  • Excessive reward for inmate or prisoner participation

To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account

Register for a free trial

Are you a student or a teacher?

Unlock Your Education

See for yourself why 30 million people use Study.com

Become a Study.com member and start learning now.
Become a Member  Back
What teachers are saying about Study.com
Free 5-day trial

Earning College Credit

Did you know… We have over 160 college courses that prepare you to earn credit by exam that is accepted by over 1,500 colleges and universities. You can test out of the first two years of college and save thousands off your degree. Anyone can earn credit-by-exam regardless of age or education level.

To learn more, visit our Earning Credit Page

Transferring credit to the school of your choice

Not sure what college you want to attend yet? Study.com has thousands of articles about every imaginable degree, area of study and career path that can help you find the school that's right for you.

Create an account to start this course today
Try it free for 5 days!
Create an account
Support