Realistic Conflict Theory: Definition & Example Video

An error occurred trying to load this video.

Try refreshing the page, or contact customer support.

Coming up next: Socialist Feminism: Definition & Overview

You're on a roll. Keep up the good work!

Take Quiz Watch Next Lesson
Your next lesson will play in 10 seconds
  • 0:01 Realistic Conflict Theory
  • 0:48 The Robber's Cave Experiment
  • 2:45 Other Examples of…
  • 4:19 Lesson Summary
Save Save Save

Want to watch this again later?

Log in or sign up to add this lesson to a Custom Course.

Log in or Sign up

Speed Speed

Recommended Lessons and Courses for You

Lesson Transcript
Instructor: Yolanda Williams

Yolanda has taught college Psychology and Ethics, and has a doctorate of philosophy in counselor education and supervision.

Realistic conflict theory is used to explain the conflict, negative prejudices, and discrimination that occur between groups of people who are in competition for the same resources. Learn more about realistic conflict theory from examples and test your knowledge with a quiz.

Definition and Examples of Realistic Conflict Theory

The realistic conflict theory states that whenever there are two or more groups that are seeking the same limited resources, this will lead to conflict, negative stereotypes and beliefs, and discrimination between the groups. The conflict can lead to increasing animosity toward the groups and can cause an ongoing feud to develop.

Conversely, conflict, negative stereotypes and beliefs, and discrimination between groups can potentially be reduced in situations where two or more groups are seeking to obtain some superordinate goals. Superordinate goals are mutually-desirable goals that cannot be obtained without the participation of two or more groups.

Because of its emphasis on group behaviors and conflict, the realistic conflict theory is also referred to as the realistic group conflict theory.

The Robber's Cave Experiment

One of the earliest examples of realistic conflict theory is the Robber's Cave experiment conducted by social psychologist Muzafer Sherif in the 1950s. Sherif conducted a field experiment at Robber's Cave State Park in Oklahoma using 22 adolescent males. Each of the 22 participants was 12 years old, came from a 2-parent home, and was from a white middle-class background. None of the participants knew each other before the experiment. Sherif divided the males into two separate groups: the Eagles and the Rattlers.

Neither of the groups was aware of the other's existence during the first stage of the experiment. During the first stage, the participants were involved in several activities with their group members such as hiking and swimming. These activities allowed participants to form attachments with their group and create their own group culture, norms, and expectations.

Once the participants had become attached to their own groups, Sherif introduced the groups to each other and arranged for competitive games and other conflicts between the groups. For example, one of the competitive games required the Eagles and the Rattlers to play each other in a baseball game. The winning group received a trophy and individual medals for the group members, while the losing group received nothing.

Sherif began to notice that the groups were calling each other names and teasing each other. However, as the competitive games continued, the groups became increasingly hostile. For example, the Eagles set the Rattlers' flag on fire and the Rattlers destroyed the Eagles' cabin. Eventually, the groups became so hostile with one another that they had to be physically separated.

Remember that the participants were 22 well-adjusted males. They were not criminals, nor did they have a history of aggressive or destructive behavior. However, once conflict and competition were introduced, their behaviors became discriminatory and hostile.

Other Examples of Realistic Conflict Theory

Suppose that the Eagles and Rattlers wanted to go on a hiking trip. The Eagles had all of the required hiking gear and the Rattlers had the required hiking maps and boots. The two groups would have to share their resources and cooperate with each other in order to make the hiking trip happen - a superordinate goal. Without cooperation, neither group would be able to go on the hiking trip. This cooperation might lead to positive communication between the two groups and could repair the relationship between the two.

To unlock this lesson you must be a Member.
Create your account

Register to view this lesson

Are you a student or a teacher?

Unlock Your Education

See for yourself why 30 million people use

Become a member and start learning now.
Become a Member  Back
What teachers are saying about
Try it risk-free for 30 days

Earning College Credit

Did you know… We have over 200 college courses that prepare you to earn credit by exam that is accepted by over 1,500 colleges and universities. You can test out of the first two years of college and save thousands off your degree. Anyone can earn credit-by-exam regardless of age or education level.

To learn more, visit our Earning Credit Page

Transferring credit to the school of your choice

Not sure what college you want to attend yet? has thousands of articles about every imaginable degree, area of study and career path that can help you find the school that's right for you.

Create an account to start this course today
Try it risk-free for 30 days!
Create an account