Back To CoursePSAT Prep: Help and Review
18 chapters | 194 lessons
As a member, you'll also get unlimited access to over 75,000 lessons in math, English, science, history, and more. Plus, get practice tests, quizzes, and personalized coaching to help you succeed.Try it risk-free
Joshua holds a master's degree in Latin and has taught a variety of Classical literature and language courses.
Have your parents ever pretended not to know about something you'd done, only to ask you a series of seemingly innocent questions leading to your inevitable confession? They may not realize it, but parents everywhere employ Socratic irony to get to the bottom of things, since it is the practice of simulating ignorance in order to reveal the errors in another person's viewpoint or argument.
There are several types of 'irony' out there, but Socratic irony is the one that started it all. The Greek term 'eironeia' was first used by Plato in his Republic (c. 380 B.C.) to refer to the type of 'feigned ignorance' so often displayed by Socrates. This famous Greek philosopher on whom Plato's dialogues centered was in the habit of pretending to know much less than he actually did. While also subtly ingratiating himself to his various interlocutors, Socrates would play dumb, asking them a series of ostensibly harmless questions related to the particular topic of the day. By carefully choosing the questions he posed, though, Socrates was able to use the answers his fellow conversationalists provided to demonstrate their true lack of knowledge in areas where they often claimed to be experts.
Socrates employed this method of questioning not to make his companions look foolish (although he didn't seem to mind it), but rather as a means of directing people on their own paths to the truth. For this reason, in the world of education, the act of using series of questions to guide students toward an answer instead of simply providing them with it is known as the Socratic Method. However, Socratic irony may also be used in a manner comparable to your parents' implementation of it. In the case of your parents or perhaps a detective, Socratic irony's purpose is to expose the truth that the person being questioned is trying to hide, but which the interrogator already knows. Keep reading to see how this sort of irony is used by both its originator, as well as a famous TV detective!
In a particularly comedic dialogue named for Socrates' interlocutor Ion, the philosopher uses his trademark irony to prove to this poetic performer that he's not as secure in his expertise as he'd like to believe. For Socrates, poetry was a technical art, and in order to master such an art, he believed it required knowledge of all its forms and contributors. By asking Ion a series of questions on his specialized performances (the works of Homer), Socrates is able to lead Ion to the disconcerting realization that he's probably not as awesome a rhapsode as he claims to be:
'Ion: Really, Socrates, it's worth hearing how well I've got Homer dressed up…
Socrates: Really, I shall make time to hear that later. Now I'd just like an answer to this: Are you so wonderfully clever about Homer alone - or also about Hesiod and Archilochus?
Ion: No, no. Only about Homer. That's good enough, I think…
Socrates: Now you claim that Homer and the other poets…speak on the same subjects, but not equally well…
Ion: Yes, and it's true…
Socrates: You're superb! So if we say that Ion is equally clever about Homer and the other poets, we'll make no mistake…
Ion: Then how in the world do you explain what I do, Socrates? When someone discusses another poet I pay no attention, and I have no power to contribute anything worthwhile: I simply doze off…
Socrates: That's not hard to figure out, my friend. Anyone can tell that you are powerless to speak about Homer on the basis of knowledge or mastery. Because if your ability came by mastery, you would be able to speak about all the other poets, as well.'
Socratic irony can be particularly useful for detectives attempting to get the right information out of people. In the television crime drama Law & Order: Criminal Intent, Detective Bobby Goren is especially fond of this device in interrogation. Goren, a compendium of knowledge on things from pop culture to the esoteric, frequently feigns his own ignorance in order to lull suspects into a false sense of security. With their guards down, these people usually unwittingly reveal all Goren needs to know after a few seemingly harmless questions. In the excerpt below from the episode 'Chinoiserie,' Goren initially goes along with a target's ruse of impersonating a British nobleman. Pretending at first not to realize how phony his accent is, Goren gets the man to continue talking by asking him simple questions. The more the man speaks, the more obvious it becomes that he is not from (and has probably never been to) the United Kingdom:
'Goren: Lord Pembridge? Could we speak to you for a minute?
Pembridge: Well, dear, I don't know what for.
Eames: It's about some packages that were delivered to you.
Pembridge: Packages? I wouldn't know anything about packages.
Goren: Where are you from, Lord Pembridge?
Pembridge: From? Ah, my family's estate is just outside a little town called Leeds.
Goren: A little town called Leeds? And what's the purpose of your visit here?
Pembridge: Pleasure. And friends.
Goren: What friends?
Pembridge: Oh, well, I just had a dinner from Mick and the boys. Sent them off on their world tour. And then I saw Gwynnie and Hugh. Lovely people, just lovely.
Goren: Cut it out. (To Eames) Isn't that the worst English accent you've ever heard? Next to the 'Irish Spring' guy, it's the worst accent, period.'
Socratic irony refers to the practice of simulating ignorance in order to reveal the errors in another person's viewpoint or argument. The Greek 'eironeia' ('false ignorance') was first used by Plato to describe Socrates' tendency to pretend to be less knowledgeable than he was. The philosopher would engage his companions in a series of ostensibly innocent questions that would eventually reveal their errors, effectively leading them to the truth rather than simply giving it to them. In education, this act of using series of questions to guide students toward an answer instead of providing them with it is known as the Socratic Method. Socratic irony may also be employed, however, by those such as parents or detectives who use it to pry confessional or otherwise incriminating evidence from those they interrogate.
To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account
Already a member? Log InBack
Did you know… We have over 160 college courses that prepare you to earn credit by exam that is accepted by over 1,500 colleges and universities. You can test out of the first two years of college and save thousands off your degree. Anyone can earn credit-by-exam regardless of age or education level.
To learn more, visit our Earning Credit Page
Not sure what college you want to attend yet? Study.com has thousands of articles about every imaginable degree, area of study and career path that can help you find the school that's right for you.
Back To CoursePSAT Prep: Help and Review
18 chapters | 194 lessons
Next LessonTextuality: Definition & Standards