Copyright

The British & The U.S. Electoral Systems

An error occurred trying to load this video.

Try refreshing the page, or contact customer support.

Coming up next: Comparing Public Policy in the U.S. & Great Britain

You're on a roll. Keep up the good work!

Take Quiz Watch Next Lesson
 Replay
Your next lesson will play in 10 seconds
  • 0:01 Most-Watched Elections
  • 0:58 Political Structures
  • 1:43 Role of Parties
  • 3:48 An Administration or a…
  • 5:15 Lesson Summary
Save Save Save

Want to watch this again later?

Log in or sign up to add this lesson to a Custom Course.

Log in or Sign up

Timeline
Autoplay
Autoplay
Speed Speed
Lesson Transcript
Instructor: Kevin Newton

Kevin has edited encyclopedias, taught middle and high school history, and has a master's degree in Islamic law.

Ever see images of the American president and British prime minister talking to each other at political summits? While they often look quite similar, the two individuals took entirely different routes to achieve their respective political roles.

Most-Watched Elections

Few exercises in democracy make quite as much of a media hit as an American presidential or British general election. Debates, interviews with a number of people best described as 'an everyman,' countdowns that stretch late into the night when the voting behavior of specific neighborhoods is analyzed and reanalyzed: it just beams with drama. Throw in the fact that in many ways the destiny of the next several years of world affairs hinges on the opinions of 330 million Americans or 60 million Britons, and you've got the sort of stuff that network executives dream of. Except for the politically apathetic, people of every status are glued to the media.

And yet, the two systems couldn't be more different. While only royalty approaches the gravitas of the American president, at the end of the day, he or she is precisely only one-third of the American government. Meanwhile, while the prime minister position has much less soft power and is essentially, a legalized dictatorship.

Political Structures

This is in no small part due to the fact that the Americans and the British have completely different institutions of power. The United States had to focus largely on stability because it was a republic from its earliest days. Therefore, while the office of the president is quite powerful, it is still only one third of the federal government; there are still the affairs of Congress and the Supreme Court to consider.

Meanwhile, Parliament was formed in an inherently stable system and it grew from an advisory council to the monarch to become the government of the United Kingdom. As such, an incredible amount of power is up for grabs when the British hold general elections. The status of the British state is guaranteed by the authority of the monarch, but the course is set by the people.

Role of Parties

Despite these differences, both the Americans and the British use a system of political parties for their elections. In the United States, the dominant parties are the Democrats and the Republicans, while the United Kingdom has the Conservatives, Labour, and Liberal Democrats. Despite both using parties, their roles are quite different.

In the United States, a would-be candidate for president must first gain the approval of his or her party. To do this, they have to win nomination at a convention, which is largely decided on the result of the person's performance against other aspiring candidates in a series of primary elections. These primary elections are particularly vicious, as the right to run for the highest office of the land is the reward. If they prove electable, they are given the nomination of their party and then run against the candidates from the other parties in a general election, often called a presidential election.

Things in the United Kingdom are a bit different. First, the British have no primary system. Instead, individuals choose to join a political party and climb the ladder to become the party leader. For Labour, true to its name, members and trade unions have a voice in deciding leadership, while the Conservatives decide just amongst members. The trade-off is that the Labour leader has to grant a great deal of power to other Labour dignitaries. Meanwhile, once a Conservative becomes leader, he or she largely can decide policy as they wish.

To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account

Register to view this lesson

Are you a student or a teacher?

Unlock Your Education

See for yourself why 30 million people use Study.com

Become a Study.com member and start learning now.
Become a Member  Back
What teachers are saying about Study.com
Try it risk-free for 30 days

Earning College Credit

Did you know… We have over 200 college courses that prepare you to earn credit by exam that is accepted by over 1,500 colleges and universities. You can test out of the first two years of college and save thousands off your degree. Anyone can earn credit-by-exam regardless of age or education level.

To learn more, visit our Earning Credit Page

Transferring credit to the school of your choice

Not sure what college you want to attend yet? Study.com has thousands of articles about every imaginable degree, area of study and career path that can help you find the school that's right for you.

Create an account to start this course today
Try it risk-free for 30 days!
Create an account
Support