The Critical Thinking Process: Point-of-View, Assumptions, Evidence & Conclusions

An error occurred trying to load this video.

Try refreshing the page, or contact customer support.

Coming up next: Alexander Pope's An Essay on Man: Summary & Analysis

You're on a roll. Keep up the good work!

Take Quiz Watch Next Lesson
Your next lesson will play in 10 seconds
  • 0:01 A Passion for Motorcycles
  • 0:44 Stating a Point of View
  • 1:54 Origins and Assumptions
  • 2:54 Evidence, Conclusions,…
  • 5:09 Lesson Summary
Add to Add to Add to

Want to watch this again later?

Log in or sign up to add this lesson to a Custom Course.

Login or Sign up

Create an account to start this course today
Try it free for 5 days!
Create An Account

Recommended Lessons and Courses for You

Lesson Transcript
Instructor: Christine Serva

Christine is an instructional designer, educator, and writer with a particular interest in the social sciences and American studies.

In this lesson, you'll learn the steps involved in the critical thinking process. You'll consider how coming to a conclusion effectively involves multiple questions that get you thinking about a topic in a new way.

A Passion for Motorcycles

Max and his friend Claudia are discussing their passion for motorcycles. They both love their bikes and spend every weekend riding. But there's one major difference between the two friends: Max insists on wearing a helmet, while Claudia rarely does.

In this lesson, you'll hear the two friends talk and learn how Max understands this issue. You'll find out more about the critical thinking process he's used to come to the conclusion that a universal helmet law is necessary for public safety. The critical thinking process is a model for how to analyze an issue. This process includes steps and questions that help you to think through a topic thoroughly.

Stating a Point of View

Max will first state an initial point of view, a first step in the critical thinking process. He says to Claudia, 'It's my view that helmets are extremely important for rider safety, and we must wear them.'

Claudia's point of view is very different. She feels that helmet laws interfere with personal freedom. But Claudia decides that today's the day to find out more about why he is such an advocate for helmets. 'Okay, I'll listen - for now,' she says.

Max then goes on to define a point of view more clearly, including stating that, 'A universal helmet law is the most effective way to save lives in motorcycle accidents.' This pinpoints his perspective even more clearly than simply saying that it's best to wear a helmet. To make sure his argument is fully understood, he could give examples. For instance, he could explain that a universal helmet law requires all motorcycle riders and passengers of all ages to wear helmets. He can explain how some states have partial helmet laws that only apply to certain groups and ages.

Origins and Assumptions

Max has given the topic of helmets a lot of thought. He lost his cousin to a motorcycle accident when his cousin was 25 and died of a brain injury resulting from when his head hit the pavement. If Max wants to think through the issue carefully, he will consider the origins of his position.

Max and Claudia also make two very different assumptions that factor into their thinking and reasoning. If they both identify their assumptions, they might say something like the following:

Max: 'At times, concerns for public safety must outweigh certain personal freedoms.'

Claudia: 'Personal freedoms should not be limited for public safety, except in extreme cases.'

Identifying assumptions can help to clarify what is factoring into their argument. If their assumptions are more transparent to their audience and to themselves, they can think through the issues more thoroughly.

Evidence, Conclusions, and Consequences

Max moves on to weigh the facts about helmets. He will use reasons and evidence as he considers the topic. He notes Center for Disease Control statistics, including their findings that 'helmets reduce the risk of death by 37% and head injury by 69%.' He also looks at how alternative options, like a partial helmet law, are harder to enforce, and so do not save as many lives.

As a critical thinker, he also wants to hear Claudia's perspective. He aims to acknowledge other points of view rather than dismiss her thinking without understanding it. He asks her to follow the same process he has in laying out her rationale for why she and others should not be required to wear helmets.

In her critical thinking process, Claudia cites that there is limited funding provided to educational programs for drivers and bikers on how to avoid collisions. She suggests that a next step could be more research into whether other efforts could save lives as effectively.

To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account

Register for a free trial

Are you a student or a teacher?
I am a teacher

Unlock Your Education

See for yourself why 30 million people use Study.com

Become a Study.com member and start learning now.
Become a Member  Back

Earning College Credit

Did you know… We have over 95 college courses that prepare you to earn credit by exam that is accepted by over 2,000 colleges and universities. You can test out of the first two years of college and save thousands off your degree. Anyone can earn credit-by-exam regardless of age or education level.

To learn more, visit our Earning Credit Page

Transferring credit to the school of your choice

Not sure what college you want to attend yet? Study.com has thousands of articles about every imaginable degree, area of study and career path that can help you find the school that's right for you.

Create an account to start this course today
Try it free for 5 days!
Create An Account