Anthony is currently a County Civil Prosecutor and has his Juris Doctorate. He has been a guest lecturer at several local universities.
United States v. Leon: Case Brief
Facts
Police officers from the Burbank, California Police Department were conducting a drug-trafficking investigation. During their investigation they conducted surveillance of Alberto Leon and Richardo Del Castillo. The police officers also had a confidential informant who provided them with information. Based on their independent investigation and the confidential informant's information, they prepared a search warrant application for Leon's three residences and his automobiles. Part of this application included an affidavit, a written statement confirmed by oath, often used in court proceedings.
After the application was reviewed by several district attorneys, it was presented to a state court magistrate (and officer of the State, usually referred to as a judge) and signed by Officer Rombach. The state court magistrate then issued the search warrant. During the execution of the search warrant, large quantities of drugs and other evidence of Leon's criminal conduct was found.
At the trial court, in this case the district court, Leon's defense counsel filed a motion asserting that the affidavit of the search warrant was insufficient to establish probable cause for search warrant to be issued. The trial court sided with Leon's defense counsel, and the search warrant was invalid. They also concluded that although Officer Rombach acted in good faith, there was no 'good faith exception' (the police officer's belief that he was acting according to the law) to the Fourth Amendment's exclusionary rule, as the district attorneys attempted to argue.
This case was then brought to the Court of Appeals, affirmed, and finally appealed before the United States Supreme Court.
Issues
The issued presented before the U. S. Supreme Court was whether a 'good faith exception' to the Fourth Amendment's exclusionary rule should be recognized.
Holding
The U.S. Supreme Court determined that there should be an exception to the exclusionary rule of the Fourth Amendment. They held that when a police officer acts in a reasonable manner relying on a search warrant that was issued by a neutral magistrate, but ultimately found to be invalid, the evidence collected should not be barred from trial.
Rationale
The U.S. Supreme Court examined the Fourth Amendment's origin and purpose when determining whether or not to impose exclusionary rule in this particular set of facts. They weighed the benefits and the costs of preventing the District Attorney's from using the inherently trustworthy and tangible evidence in their case in chief.
After weighing those factors they determined that the exclusionary rule should be used where a Fourth Amendment violation has been substantial and deliberate, but that a balancing approach should be used in determining whether the rule should be applied in a variety of contexts, including criminal trials. This suggests that the rule should be modified to permit the introduction of evidence obtained by officers reasonably relying on a warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate.
They U.S. Supreme Court's rationale for the Fourth Amendment is to deter police misconduct. This was an essential part of determining whether or not the 'good faith exception' would apply in this case. Here it was the magistrate's error, not the police officer's, that caused the search warrant to become invalid. The court determined that the Fourth Amendment cannot be used to deter objectively reasonable law enforcement activity. It was their determination that an officer cannot be expected to question the magistrate's probable cause determination or his judgment; the form of the warrant is technically sufficient. Once the warrant is issued, the police officers must then comply with the laws and should not be penalized for a magistrate's error in the issuing of the warrant.
Lesson Summary
In conclusion, United States v. Leon was a landmark legal case which established an exception to the exclusionary rule of the Fourth Amendment: that evidence obtained from invalid search warrants due to a judicial, or magistrate-made, error was still admissible, provided one could demonstrate that the magistrate issuing the search warrant was neutral and detached, that there was substantial basis for determining the existence of probable cause, and that there was no police misconduct.
To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account
Register to view this lesson
Unlock Your Education
See for yourself why 30 million people use Study.com
Become a Study.com member and start learning now.
Become a MemberAlready a member? Log In
BackUnited States v. Leon: Case Brief
Related Study Materials
- TExES Science of Teaching Reading (293): Practice & Study Guide
- Next Gen NCLEX-PN Study Guide & Practice
- Next Gen NCLEX-RN Study Guide & Practice
- TExES Core Subjects EC-6 (391): Practice & Study Guide
- TExES School Counselor (252): Practice & Study Guide
- Multithreading, Networking & Machine Learning in Python
- Digital Forensics
- The Internet of Things and Networking
- Network Routing and Switching
- Virtual Servers and Networking
- How to Pick Your Homeschool Curriculum
- Role of Student Support in Open & Distance Learning
- TExES Principal Exam Redesign (068 vs. 268)
- Teacher Salary by State
- ESL Resource Guide for Teachers
- What is a Homeschool Co-op?
- How to Start Homeschooling Your Children
Latest Courses
- Chemical Nomenclature & Notation
- Factors Impacting Family & Consumer Sciences
- Heritability Coefficient
- Major Health Problems in the United States
- Task-Centered Approaches in Social Work
- Asymmetric Induction: Definition, Factors & Methods
- Termination of Services in Social Work: Ethical & Legal Issues
- Quiz & Worksheet - Memory Hole in 1984
- Finding a Character's Emotions by Actions: Quiz & Worksheet for Kids
- What are Dinosaurs Related to? - Quiz & Worksheet for Kids
- Quiz & Worksheet - Types of Personality Disorders
- Flashcards - Real Estate Marketing Basics
- Flashcards - Promotional Marketing in Real Estate
- Free Lesson Plans
- ESL Lesson Plans for ESL Teachers
Latest Lessons
- Gamification in Education
- UExcel Labor Relations: Study Guide & Test Prep
- High School Chemistry: Help and Review
- GMAT Prep: Tutoring Solution
- GRE Quantitative Reasoning: Study Guide & Test Prep
- Critical Thinking Skills for AP US History: Help and Review
- Western Civilization Post-1945
- Quiz & Worksheet - Contracts for Sale of Goods
- Quiz & Worksheet - Comparing the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments
- Quiz & Worksheet - Pros & Cons of Job Rotation
- Quiz & Worksheet - Unilateral vs. Bilateral Contracts
- Quiz & Worksheet - Invasive Species
Popular Courses
- What is Creative Curriculum?
- World Economy: Definition & History
- National Science Standards for High School
- TExES Core Subjects EC-6: Test Dates & Registration
- Oregon Science Standards
- One Point Perspective Lesson Plan
- Colorado Science Standards for 5th Grade
- Arizona Science Standards for 3rd Grade
- Colorado State Standards for Social Studies
- Arizona English Language Proficiency Standards
- 504 Plans in Maine
- 4th Grade Ohio Science Standards
Popular Lessons
Math
Social Sciences
Science
Business
Humanities
Education
History
Art and Design
Tech and Engineering
- Tech and Engineering - Videos
- Tech and Engineering - Quizzes
- Tech and Engineering - Questions & Answers