What Is Vicarious Liability? - Definition and Examples

An error occurred trying to load this video.

Try refreshing the page, or contact customer support.

Coming up next: Punitive Damages: Definition & Examples

You're on a roll. Keep up the good work!

Take Quiz Watch Next Lesson
Your next lesson will play in 10 seconds
  • 0:05 Indirect Parties to a Lawsuit
  • 2:52 Lange v. Nabisco…
  • 4:06 Other Forms of…
  • 5:32 Lesson Summary
Save Save Save

Want to watch this again later?

Log in or sign up to add this lesson to a Custom Course.

Log in or Sign up

Speed Speed

Recommended Lessons and Courses for You

Lesson Transcript
Instructor: Kat Kadian-Baumeyer

Kat has a Master of Science in Organizational Leadership and Management and teaches Business courses.

Most times, a liability lawsuit is directed at the negligent party. Sometimes, a lawsuit can involve parties who are not directly involved in the dispute because of the relationship the outside party has with the defendant.

Indirect Parties to a Lawsuit

Eager to start your day, you run into the local diner to grab a cup of coffee and a donut. When the waitress arrives to pour your coffee, you notice that she is a bit wobbly on her feet. You also notice she is wearing a medical alert bracelet, but don't pay much attention to it. She pours the steaming hot coffee in your cup, on the table and even your lap. After letting out a loud yelp, it becomes painfully obvious that you require medical attention to treat your first-degree burns. This means you will be out of work, unable to wear pants and need costly follow-up care.

You think 'someone must pay for this action!' The waitress was unable to perform her job due to what could have been a medical condition. And you are correct - well, sort of. Someone must pay, but it is the employer that will bear the brunt of this waitress's actions. You see, the doctrine of vicarious liability holds that there can be a person responsible for the actions of another because of a special relationship the parties maintain, like employee/employer and parent/child.

At one time, the courts held that a husband may be responsible for the actions of his wife. This contention has long been abandoned. Let's explore the employee/employer relationship for a moment. When an employee causes injury or damages to another party during the course of his employment, the employer may become the responsible party. This is all because of the doctrine of respondeat superior. In Latin, this translates to 'let the master answer' and, in modern times, means the employer is responsible for the actions of his employees, if the actions cause injury to a party to which the employer owes a duty of care.

In order for a court to determine whether an employee acted within the scope of employment, the court will look at a few things:

  • The act or action occurred while the employee was at the workplace and within the hours of the employee's schedule.
  • The employer must have employed the employee at the time of the incident. In other words, the employee had a reason to be at work at the time.
  • The injury was a result of the act or actions of the employee in the capacity that the employee was hired (a waitress is hired to serve coffee, amongst other things).

The criteria are important in determining the level of responsibility the employer has to such acts or actions. In this case, the waitress may have been ill while at work. This may have contributed to her spilling the coffee. Let's look at a case involving a fight between an employee and a shopkeeper.

Lange v. Nabisco Biscuit Company

Ronnell Lynch, a Nabisco Biscuit Company salesperson, was hired in March of 1969 to deliver and stock bakery products on store shelves. Given his own territory, Lynch made stops at local stores to replenish previously delivered products for consumer purchase. Sometime on May 1, 1969, Lynch arrived at Lange's store to stock the shelves, but noticed that the prime shelf space was not available.

After exchanging words with Lange over the use of specific shelves, Lynch violently assaulted Lange. On his way out of the store, Lynch even threw products on the floor. Lange subsequently sued Nabisco Biscuit Company for damages he suffered at the hands of their employee and won. The simple test proved that Lynch was working for Nabisco, making him an agent, or representative of the company at the time.

During that time, he violated the company's duty of care to an entity or relation to the company and an injury was suffered as a result. It was the court's belief that regardless of whether the employer knew of, authorized or whether the act was willful, the employee acted within the scope of his job.

Other Forms of Vicarious Liability

How does vicarious liability work when someone borrows your car and wrecks it? The law sees it this way. Depending on the specific state law, once you hand over the keys, you are assuming responsibility for anything that happens with the vehicle. That is even if you're not present.

To unlock this lesson you must be a Member.
Create your account

Register to view this lesson

Are you a student or a teacher?

Unlock Your Education

See for yourself why 30 million people use

Become a member and start learning now.
Become a Member  Back
What teachers are saying about
Try it risk-free for 30 days

Earning College Credit

Did you know… We have over 200 college courses that prepare you to earn credit by exam that is accepted by over 1,500 colleges and universities. You can test out of the first two years of college and save thousands off your degree. Anyone can earn credit-by-exam regardless of age or education level.

To learn more, visit our Earning Credit Page

Transferring credit to the school of your choice

Not sure what college you want to attend yet? has thousands of articles about every imaginable degree, area of study and career path that can help you find the school that's right for you.

Create an account to start this course today
Try it risk-free for 30 days!
Create an account