Table of Contents
- What is a Dual Court System?
- When was the United States Judicial Branch Created?
- What was the Judiciary Act of 1789?
- Lesson Summary
A dual court system comprises two court systems operating independently. One of the two key parts of this system is the state court. The other is the federal court. The function of the state court is to act on the local level. On the other hand, the federal court runs issues that affect the nation. The state governments are given the authority to create their own laws; hence, each law varies from state to state. However, federal laws are constant everywhere in the U.S.
John is a resident of Arizona. He is suing an alleged credit card fraudster Ken, a Texas resident, for stealing his credit card and withdrawing a total of $100,000. Since the plaintiff and the defendant do not share common state citizenship, their case is being heard in a federal court. The diversity of citizenship requires both parties to defend themselves in an unbiased court.
The dual court system works by dividing the cases to be heard in federal and state courts. Most crimes such as rape, murder, and robbery violate the state laws and are hence heard in the state courts. On the other hand, cases that involve a foreign government, Native American rights, copyright infringement, or controversies between different states are heard in federal court. The federal court also hears a dispute involving parties from a different state in which damages of at least $75,000 is involved.
The dual court system works efficiently in the United States. However, it is essential to understand the reason behind the formation of this court system. So why does America have a dual court system? Some of the Framers that wrote the Constitution created the dual court system out of fear that the states and people might lose their independence to the federal government. For the states to maintain their judiciary structure and legislative authority, the Founders choose to limit the federal court cases. This is known as limited jurisdiction. This means that the federal court can only hear special cases; the rest are left to the state courts.
Before the development of the Constitution, the United States did not have a judiciary branch. Article III played a massive impact on the creation of the U.S. court system. This is because it created a federal court system with the authority to create district courts. But who created the federal court system? The system was created by the first congress after they created the Judiciary Act. The Act defined the federal court system structure, including the number of chief justices, circuit courts, the Supreme Court, and the district courts.
The constant debate since the establishment of the court system has been how to balance the nation's interest with the individual states' interests. The Judicial branch uses federalism to balance the national and individual state interests. Federalism can be defined as the division of power between the state government and the federal government. Both have two types of power: exclusive power and concurrent power, which help to balance the power between the two governments. Exclusive powers are exercised by an individual order of government, either the state government or the national government. Concrete powers are the powers that are shared by both the state government and the federal government.
The first congress created a particular act that led to the establishment of the current court system. The Judiciary Act of Congress established the federal court system. The Act served numerous purposes. This Act led to the development of the judicial branch, which constitutes of three parts, namely:
Cases that are heard in the state court start from the lowest level.
The cases heard in the federal court also start from the lowest level.
The dual court system in America consists of two parts. The federal court system operates on the national level. The second court system runs locally and is referred to as the state court system. This type of court system was created to distribute power between the state and national governments. The intention was to prevent the federal government from being too powerful. The federal court system deals with issues between citizens of different states and disputes involving foreign treaties.
On the other hand, the state court system acts locally. Before the development of the Constitution, the U.S was a country without a federal-level judiciary branch of government. Article III played an essential role in the development of the court system. The first-ever congress made the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act then determined the federal court structure, including the Supreme Court and the number of chief justices, district courts, and circuit courts. However, the constant debate after the establishment of the court system has been on how to balance the national interest with the state interest. Federalism eliminates the court system's disadvantages because the state and federal governments share power. Both the state government and the federal government were granted concurrent powers and exclusive powers.
To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account
The judicial branch was founded to check the legislature and the executive power. It was also established to settle conflicts between various states.
This Act defined the federal court system structure. The Act also defined the number of district courts and circuit courts.
The U.S court system has a constitution that resolves conflicts concerning federal laws. The state court is also left to solve disputes concerning their states.
The United States uses the dual court system. Issues concerning divorce and robbery in a particular state are heard in the state court, and matters concerning individuals of different states are presided by the federal court.
This system is significant because both are ready to protect citizens' rights. If an innocent person is charged, they can seek justice in another venue.
Already a member? Log InBack
I would definitely recommend Study.com to my colleagues. It’s like a teacher waved a magic wand and did the work for me. I feel like it’s a lifeline.